When the sprawling highways were put in, nobody ever considered that everybody would get sick of driving all the time and that each highway widening project would precipitate even more driving and ever-increasing congestion.
Fortunately, there are some compact mainstreet communities in the LA area. These are excellent candidates for complete streets and biking infrastructure. If this can nucleate in some communities more folks will gravitate towards communities with less driving. That will be a very "long game" process however.
Yeah, Santa Monica and Manhattan Beach come to mind. Although I'm not sure it's really feasible for the average person to be able to afford to live in these areas.
The article demonstrates the reality versus pie in the sky comparisons with level of service versus vehicle miles traveled: The emergency vehicle response will have a more difficult time in the new mobility plan.
Also, this reporter is on board for the plan, just wish he would do a little more due diligence; what will a 170% increase in bicyclists look like on roadways: 100 to 270 bicyclists on a corridor does not justify removing a vehicular lane which can transport 880 vehicles. Walking up by 38%, walking is a localized transport method and does not address long distances, transit use up 56% with 147,000 current riders brings the 2035 value up to 230,000 individuals, or 90,000 less trips. With a 10 million population and an estimated a population of 2.5 million between 18 and 64 and an estimated 75%, my estimate, you get 1.9 million drivers per day. With 1.9 million trips, 90,000 does not make a significant difference.
And now they're adding bus and bike lanes? God, what a repressive shithole.