undefined | Better HN

0 pointsjMyles10y ago0 comments

I certainly didn't downvote you.

I do, however, disagree.

In this particular case, it seems that the method employed to "stop idiots who don't know what they're doing from interfering with aircraft weather radar" is to infringe on everyone's right both to run software without the government assessing its content and to broadcast signals regardless of their content.

0 comments

cpncrunch10y ago

Assuming that the radio and router are separate and only the radio firmware is locked down, is there any way that the NSA could snoop on the content? Or are you saying you want to have the right to reprogram the radio?

quotemstr10y ago

I'd be happy [1] with locked-down radio firmware if it could talk only to the radio.

One big problem is that coprocessors in embedded systems often have full access to the memory bus, meaning there's no way to stop a trojan in the closed and locked radio firmware from reading and modifying any bit of system memory, which can include your personal data and encryption keys.

[1] Although I'd hope that it'd still be possible to buy or build a general-purpose SDR.

cpncrunch10y ago

I would have thought (correct me if I'm wrong) that it would be pretty straightforward to give the radio unit its own memory, and not give it access to the system memory bus at all. However I don't know if manufacturers will want to go to the trouble of segregating the radio.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointsjMyles10y ago0 comments

I certainly didn't downvote you.

I do, however, disagree.

0 comments

cpncrunch10y ago

quotemstr10y ago

I'd be happy [1] with locked-down radio firmware if it could talk only to the radio.

[1] Although I'd hope that it'd still be possible to buy or build a general-purpose SDR.

cpncrunch10y ago

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse