Skip to content
Better HN
Top
New
Best
Ask
Show
Jobs
Search
⌘K
undefined | Better HN
0 points
amazing_jose
10y ago
0 comments
Share
NOPE! That could imply that they are employees and we all know that's impossible ;)
0 comments
default
newest
oldest
TazeTSchnitzel
10y ago
Oh right, I forgot that they're skirting employment law.
run4yourlives2
10y ago
The funny thing is that this wouldn't fly in Canada, (and I'm assuming other jurisdictions, like California), since even the inference of an employer/employee relationship constitutes one when it comes to legal entitlements and responsibilities.
j
/
k
navigate · click thread line to collapse