A-Frame: open-source WebVR framework from Mozilla (opens in new tab)

(aframe.io)

91 pointschuckharmston10y ago9 comments

9 comments

It's similar to X3DOM in the sense you have the 3D scenegraph in HTML (except it's their own components, not a standard like X3D).

Also it's based on three.js which is a solid 3D engine.

moron4hire10y ago

Yeah, I don't understand the point of Mozilla making their own flavor of this, rather than contributing to X3D. Or hell, any of the several other open source projects of a similar nature.

mattdesl10y ago

Well, a few major differences I'm seeing at a glance:

- X3DOM supports Flash as well as an X3D plugin. A-Frame is specifically targeting WebGL and has a much smaller surface area

- A-Frame is based on ThreeJS rather than a custom engine

- A-Frame seems to be embracing modularity a lot more than X3DOM, and it seems likely that users will be able to build highly specialized components published as npm modules (much like we see with React components)

- A-Frame is specifically focused on VR out of the box

- The markup language and intended target audience is significantly different

ngokevin10y ago

A-Frame is based on an entity-component system. It favors composability over hierarchy. Dig deep in the docs and see that's actually quite different than standard wrapping shapes in HTML elements.

fulafel10y ago

And XML3D, and Glam.. None of these have seen much uptake, hope Mozilla has better luck.

1 more reply

polskibus10y ago

Interesting, as others mentioned X3D similarity is obvious.

I wonder how would A-Frame compose with D3.js though .

sebg10y ago

Since A-Frame mentions this => "A-Frame is ultimately just the DOM, so developers can also manipulate it with standard JavaScript methods,"... it means D3.js should work beautifully with it (as should other frameworks that do data <==> DOM binding/manipulation)

ngokevin10y ago

Yup, we've tried and A-Frame works wonderfully with D3 and React.

mingodad10y ago

The demos burn cpu all the time.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

9 comments

wildpeaks10y ago

It's similar to X3DOM in the sense you have the 3D scenegraph in HTML (except it's their own components, not a standard like X3D).

Also it's based on three.js which is a solid 3D engine.

moron4hire10y ago

Yeah, I don't understand the point of Mozilla making their own flavor of this, rather than contributing to X3D. Or hell, any of the several other open source projects of a similar nature.

mattdesl10y ago

Well, a few major differences I'm seeing at a glance:

- X3DOM supports Flash as well as an X3D plugin. A-Frame is specifically targeting WebGL and has a much smaller surface area

- A-Frame is based on ThreeJS rather than a custom engine

- A-Frame is specifically focused on VR out of the box

- The markup language and intended target audience is significantly different

ngokevin10y ago

A-Frame is based on an entity-component system. It favors composability over hierarchy. Dig deep in the docs and see that's actually quite different than standard wrapping shapes in HTML elements.

fulafel10y ago

And XML3D, and Glam.. None of these have seen much uptake, hope Mozilla has better luck.

1 more reply

polskibus10y ago

Interesting, as others mentioned X3D similarity is obvious.

I wonder how would A-Frame compose with D3.js though .

sebg10y ago

ngokevin10y ago

Yup, we've tried and A-Frame works wonderfully with D3 and React.

mingodad10y ago

The demos burn cpu all the time.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse