Show HN: Hooks – Stay Up to Date on Anything Through Push Notifications (opens in new tab)

(gethooksapp.com)

52 pointskozkozkoz10y ago29 comments

29 comments

I have a feature request: I loved the idea at first glance but then I was appalled to discover that there's nowhere to register a callback URL for any of these events.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Webhook

To me it just seems obvious that there should be an either/or option for SMS or HTTP especially since a metric shitton of people are already using slack and hipchat.

The transmission costs for HTTP are way more cheap than SMS so it seems like it would be in you guy's interest to support webhooks in order to reduce outbound SMS costs.

TLDR; HTTP is the new SMS

jakejake10y ago

This doesn't strike me as a developer tool (though it could obviously be used by developers). It's for consumers. I don't know of many consumers who want to receive notifications via webhook.

If they did do webhooks then you could write one that sent out SMSs though - leave them to do the hard part while cutting them out of the loop!

Also I think it's push notifications, not SMS.

hackercomplex10y ago

This kind of thinking reminds me of Twitter in the early days where one founder was trying to pigeonhole it into being for a particular use case. Twitter began it's life as an SMS play also if my memory serves me correctly.

Really it's up to the startup.. do they want to try to eventually become the Internet's primary notification propagation channel or are the only interested in catering to a particular mobile phone use case ?

kozkozkozOP10y ago

Hi, we are working on adding this to our API as webhooks, so you can use the content on your app. For now you can check this: https://dev.gethooksapp.com

joshschreuder10y ago

Nice work - looks like a cross between IFTTT and Pushbullet. What are your differentiating factors?

kozkozkozOP10y ago

Good question, I love both of this tools, while IFTTT is more about automation, on Hooks we are focusing on notifications only. Our value is the content, it's very easy to create alerts about many things with just one click.

Actually we are working on adding Hooks as an IFTTT channel later this month as a trigger so anyone can build their own receipts.

christophersu10y ago

How does this differ from Pushbullet's channels?

rahimnathwani10y ago

I came here to ask the same thing, sort of. Pushover and Pushbullet both work with IFTTT, and IIRC used to be the only way to get IFTTT to send you mobile push notifications.

However, now that IFTTT supports push notifications, why do you still need Pushover or Pushbullet?

cellularmitosis10y ago

This is the first I've heard of Pushbullet, and boy is their marketing frustrating. I just spent 5 minutes trying to answer the question "Is this a service which turns an HTTP POST into an iOS push notification?", only to be greeted with answers like "Bring together your devices, friends, and the things you care about". Argh.

2 more replies

ngoel3610y ago

Is this better than Facebook's notify? (Which I actually love - relevant stuff waiting for me on my lock screen without any audio notifications)

kozkozkozOP10y ago

It's different. On Facebook Notify you subscribe to a channel and then they decide what you get, very similar to rss feed. On Hooks you customize what you want to get exactly and where you want to get it from, like post with 200 points on HN so you get only the content you asked for.

FreedomToCreate10y ago

They should call the app "Get Distracted". Its an interesting idea, and potentially very useful, but most likely its going to become the annoying reason your phone keeps going off every 5 minutes. Will give it a try to see.

espinchi10y ago

When I first used it, I got overexcited and configured way too many alerts. But I've been trimming it down heavily, and now a fair percentage of the pushes I get are relevant to me.

kozkozkozOP10y ago

Cool, how long have you been using Hooks for? Actually this happens a lot, our fault for sure, we need to remove some alerts like "TC all content" :)

1 more reply

afarrell10y ago

I find my distractions are more an internal impulse to check things than an external perturbation by someone else. Having a tool that offloads that from my brain would be useful.

kozkozkozOP10y ago

Good point, but on average our users get about 1-2 per day as you choose exactly what you want to receive.

jsonne10y ago

Ehh, I'm not sure. In reality I use it mostly for work etc.

finnn10y ago

Why does this need to be an app? What does it do that a website can't?

espinchi10y ago

Well it's about push notifications to your phone, so it has to be an app.

finnn10y ago

That is not true. [0] [1]

[2] is my crappy push notification service mostly built for my own usage because PushBullet started getting more bloated and annoying.

[0]: https://developers.google.com/web/updates/2015/03/push-notif...

[1]: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Push_API

[2]: https://github.com/thefinn93/EasyPush

2 more replies

kozkozkozOP10y ago

This is just the start. Also some notifications are time sensitive and you always carry your phone with you so you won't miss it.

We are also working on notifications API for Chrome as the next step for the web interface.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

29 comments

hackercomplex10y ago

I have a feature request: I loved the idea at first glance but then I was appalled to discover that there's nowhere to register a callback URL for any of these events.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Webhook

To me it just seems obvious that there should be an either/or option for SMS or HTTP especially since a metric shitton of people are already using slack and hipchat.

The transmission costs for HTTP are way more cheap than SMS so it seems like it would be in you guy's interest to support webhooks in order to reduce outbound SMS costs.

TLDR; HTTP is the new SMS

jakejake10y ago

This doesn't strike me as a developer tool (though it could obviously be used by developers). It's for consumers. I don't know of many consumers who want to receive notifications via webhook.

If they did do webhooks then you could write one that sent out SMSs though - leave them to do the hard part while cutting them out of the loop!

Also I think it's push notifications, not SMS.

hackercomplex10y ago

kozkozkozOP10y ago

Hi, we are working on adding this to our API as webhooks, so you can use the content on your app. For now you can check this: https://dev.gethooksapp.com

joshschreuder10y ago

Nice work - looks like a cross between IFTTT and Pushbullet. What are your differentiating factors?

kozkozkozOP10y ago

Actually we are working on adding Hooks as an IFTTT channel later this month as a trigger so anyone can build their own receipts.

christophersu10y ago

How does this differ from Pushbullet's channels?

rahimnathwani10y ago

I came here to ask the same thing, sort of. Pushover and Pushbullet both work with IFTTT, and IIRC used to be the only way to get IFTTT to send you mobile push notifications.

However, now that IFTTT supports push notifications, why do you still need Pushover or Pushbullet?

cellularmitosis10y ago

2 more replies

ngoel3610y ago

Is this better than Facebook's notify? (Which I actually love - relevant stuff waiting for me on my lock screen without any audio notifications)

kozkozkozOP10y ago

FreedomToCreate10y ago

espinchi10y ago

When I first used it, I got overexcited and configured way too many alerts. But I've been trimming it down heavily, and now a fair percentage of the pushes I get are relevant to me.

kozkozkozOP10y ago

Cool, how long have you been using Hooks for? Actually this happens a lot, our fault for sure, we need to remove some alerts like "TC all content" :)

1 more reply

afarrell10y ago

I find my distractions are more an internal impulse to check things than an external perturbation by someone else. Having a tool that offloads that from my brain would be useful.

kozkozkozOP10y ago

Good point, but on average our users get about 1-2 per day as you choose exactly what you want to receive.

jsonne10y ago

Ehh, I'm not sure. In reality I use it mostly for work etc.

finnn10y ago

Why does this need to be an app? What does it do that a website can't?

espinchi10y ago

Well it's about push notifications to your phone, so it has to be an app.

finnn10y ago

That is not true. [0] [1]

[2] is my crappy push notification service mostly built for my own usage because PushBullet started getting more bloated and annoying.

[0]: https://developers.google.com/web/updates/2015/03/push-notif...

[1]: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Push_API

[2]: https://github.com/thefinn93/EasyPush

2 more replies

kozkozkozOP10y ago

This is just the start. Also some notifications are time sensitive and you always carry your phone with you so you won't miss it.

We are also working on notifications API for Chrome as the next step for the web interface.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse