What? I've literally never seen anyone say anything negative about Bill's charity work. Can you cite some sources for that?
Microsoft "charity" however will allways be suspicious because how ridiculosly backhanded they were during their era of monopoly. Whether its justified or not remains to be seen.
You can find a single person on some forum on the internet who is against anything. That's hardly a furor.
I don't think there is any substantial negativity associated with Gate's charity work. The closest you'll find is some in the educational space who don't agree with the metrics his foundation uses to measure progress.