undefined | Better HN

0 pointsimh10y ago0 comments

That seems like a massive failing of our legal system when one party "refusing to spend money on making good arguments and finding evidence" can lead to bad legal precedents. Money should be irrelevant to it, especially because most parties can't afford to spend that money. But back in reality, you're absolutely right :(

0 comments

roel_v10y ago

Please describe a plausible construct how your proposed concept could work.

chii10y ago

have attorneys that are always state allocated to each side, not privately chosen.

JBReefer10y ago

That's ripe for abuse and incompetence, but we do it in some cases already.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse