undefined | Better HN

0 pointsjsingleton9y ago0 comments

Yeah, I was referring to new feature in ES2015/ES6, but really I mean just new ES features in general are good. It's just the naming that's problematic.

Even http://caniuse.com/#feat=arrow-functions says:

  > See support for arrow functions (ECMAScript 6)

0 comments

dangoor9y ago

Gotcha. Yeah, but hopefully the naming problem is temporary because it's a new change. If we see people referring to ES2017 as ES8, then we'll know the new naming had failed.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointsjsingleton9y ago0 comments

Yeah, I was referring to new feature in ES2015/ES6, but really I mean just new ES features in general are good. It's just the naming that's problematic.

Even http://caniuse.com/#feat=arrow-functions says:

  > See support for arrow functions (ECMAScript 6)

0 comments

dangoor9y ago

Gotcha. Yeah, but hopefully the naming problem is temporary because it's a new change. If we see people referring to ES2017 as ES8, then we'll know the new naming had failed.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse