Interesting. But how does it mean Facebook will align itself to Israels interests? Just because Zuckerberg's sister supports AIPAC doesn't mean Facebook is.

While a relationship between Facebook and Israel seems strong. How does it affect posts that are critical to Israeli policy? For example, if I post something that highlights activity that is illegal according to the UN how is Facebook to justify the removal of that post?

AIPAC is a lobbying organization with ~100K members, which may include non-Jews therefore supported by <5% of American Jews. AIPAC is hardly a "Jewish authority" in the same sense the Pope is for Catholics.

Facebook's interests in Israel are independent of religious considerations, that is, if FB wants to do business there, it needs to be responsive to government requirements. I assume that applies to any similar business operating in that environment ownership notwithstanding.

I imagine Randi Zuckerberg's attachment to Israel might increase FB's desire to be in that market, but that's a side issue. I can't see how that affects the business relationship with the government at all. Seems quite clear the government's priority is security, religion or censorship are not the motivation for the actions taken.