undefined | Better HN

0 pointspasbesoin9y ago0 comments

Haven't heard/read about this aspect, yet. Pixels are more locked down?

0 comments

One of the things that makes a phone developer-friendly is how accessible it is from a price perspective, i.e. not a £599 price tag.

mankyd9y ago

Is that true? Usually developer friendly means not-carrier-locked, which has always commanded a _higher_ price tag.

Meanwhile, iPhones have no cheap developer option either. When has developer equated with cheap?

archiepeach9y ago

You're right, not being carrier-locked is another attribute of a developer-friendly phone. I wasn't saying developer equates with cheap, but typically "developer" phones are secondary devices that people feel comfortable hacking on without risking destroying their daily driver. Therefore it wouldn't make a huge amount of sense to pay for a top-of-the-range phone when it will likely be a secondary device.

pasbesoinOP9y ago

Ah. I did think a bit of that. Agree.

Not that I'm defending it, but it looks like Google is moving from being a platform provider to a (for profit) device provider.

Given the endless bullshit surrounding third party vendor foot dragging, abandonment, etc., I'm not sure they had any other choice. For my part, I'm done with anything Android that isn't directly from Google (or maybe Samsung, for a phone). And even Google, I distrust, after they left Motorola and my Moto X to "rust" before I was even done with its contract/payments term.

paublyrne9y ago

And even Google, I distrust, after they left Motorola and my Moto X to "rust" before I was even done with its contract/payments term.

The Moto X is still getting prompt updates, regardless of the sale, no? My Moto G does at least. Certainly no rust on it.

1 more reply

VikingCoder9y ago

$27 a month is pretty dang accessible for a developer, in my opinion.

apocalyptic0n39y ago

That's on contract. As a developer at a small agency, getting a $650 purchase approved can take months or even longer because every expense is larger than you think.

1 more reply

hesarenu9y ago

In India you can get a Marshmallow devices for low as $100. Performance is acceptable for the price.

ocdtrekkie9y ago

It's been rumored to be getting much harder, yes: http://www.techtimes.com/articles/178843/20160922/are-you-pl...

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 comments

archiepeach9y ago

One of the things that makes a phone developer-friendly is how accessible it is from a price perspective, i.e. not a £599 price tag.

mankyd9y ago

Is that true? Usually developer friendly means not-carrier-locked, which has always commanded a _higher_ price tag.

Meanwhile, iPhones have no cheap developer option either. When has developer equated with cheap?

archiepeach9y ago

pasbesoinOP9y ago

Ah. I did think a bit of that. Agree.

Not that I'm defending it, but it looks like Google is moving from being a platform provider to a (for profit) device provider.

paublyrne9y ago

And even Google, I distrust, after they left Motorola and my Moto X to "rust" before I was even done with its contract/payments term.

The Moto X is still getting prompt updates, regardless of the sale, no? My Moto G does at least. Certainly no rust on it.

1 more reply

VikingCoder9y ago

$27 a month is pretty dang accessible for a developer, in my opinion.

apocalyptic0n39y ago

That's on contract. As a developer at a small agency, getting a $650 purchase approved can take months or even longer because every expense is larger than you think.

1 more reply

hesarenu9y ago

In India you can get a Marshmallow devices for low as $100. Performance is acceptable for the price.

ocdtrekkie9y ago

It's been rumored to be getting much harder, yes: http://www.techtimes.com/articles/178843/20160922/are-you-pl...

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse