Well, yes.
But if you want to address one rhetorical flourish in calling you out for assuming a link between police shootings and demographics which supported your position without addressing equally valid and likely links which didn't support your position as "racist" merely because it involved you assuming that one race (by virtue of being that race) was the victim of racism, when the data suggests that it's possible either is the victim of racism, then you are correct, it's not strictly speaking racist.
But you're well in to very technical arguments about why that's not racist.