undefined | Better HN

0 pointsuser59944619y ago0 comments

> Passive aggressive word games aside, you really can't compare "reducing the global need for oil" to "snapchat for cats".

Actually. By reducing the consumption of oil, it becomes cheaper to travel and people will travel more... increasing the consumption of oil.

Game word in point: You might be having the opposing effect of what you think :D

0 comments

It's known that we can't dig up and burning all profitably extractable hydrocarbons, if we want to avoid the worst case scenarios of global warming. See eg. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/sep/27/fracki...

dTal9y ago

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointsuser59944619y ago0 comments

> Passive aggressive word games aside, you really can't compare "reducing the global need for oil" to "snapchat for cats".

Actually. By reducing the consumption of oil, it becomes cheaper to travel and people will travel more... increasing the consumption of oil.

Game word in point: You might be having the opposing effect of what you think :D

dTal9y ago

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse