undefined | Better HN

0 pointstitzer9y ago0 comments

Of the systems I have worked on, I cannot imagine any of them working well having been designed by consensus, no matter how skilled the team members. A techlead role is that of an architect; come up with the overall design to make it logical, consistent, coherent. You definitely wouldn't want a programming language that was designed by a committee, or would you?

0 comments

bryanlarsen9y ago

My favourite programming language, Rust, is designed by committee.

zaphar9y ago

According to the Rust team page Rust has not just one "Tech Lead" but 6 who have the responsibility of

    overall direction of the project, subteam leadership, 
    cross-cutting concerns

Which to means if a deadlock happens on a subteam these six will be breaking it.

steveklabnik9y ago

Yet in general, consensus is the guiding mode of operation for all teams. The core team has never overridden a team's decision against their will, and while such a thing is technically possible, it would be considered a catastrophic event, I'd imagine.

(Source: I am one of those 8 (not six))

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse