undefined | Better HN

0 pointsatemerev9y ago0 comments

I do sincerely apologize if something I had said sounded offensive to you or anybody else.

However, I can't help but ask the question: am I the one who resorts to personal attacks here?

0 comments

Yeah, that's bullshit.

> But Babel6 is still terrible, and no input from your side can change my opinion. Or perhaps it could, if you provided some technical justification for what you did. But this article is the request to stop ranting about your work, as it hurts you.

> For that, I am sorry.

So you get what he's asking (stop the sniping without substance), you're (supposedly) contrite about it, and yet in the same breath you continue to do what you acknowledge is exactly that behavior.

Either there's some fundamental disconnect in your mind that you need to address or you should just say what you mean.

atemerevOP9y ago

I do not attack or blame the author, I say that the work (Babel6) is no good. This doesn't imply anything about the author.

You, on the other hand, attack _me_ personally. You don't even say "your words sound rude" — that I would understand.

Or there is no difference to you?

rfrey9y ago

Your comment reads (to me) as more attacks sandwiched between slices of insincere apologies. You likely did not mean it to read that way, but it does.

atemerevOP9y ago

I just tried to note that I am not surprised by the amount of rage that Babel6 transition had caused, as well as that it has nothing to do with its author's person at all.

Inalienable right of the author: at any moment in time, they can say "this is my vision and my art — take it as is or leave it".

Inalienable right of the user/reader/consumer: judging author's work in whatever way or form they want, misunderstanding it, and generally abusing it in the ways never intended by author.

Corollary 1: a user has no right to demand anything from the author. If anything crosses their mind, they might ask the author. Politely. Very. And author has the right to refuse anytime, without explanation.

Corollary 2: an author has no right to demand that user has to be happy about their work, or use it the one correct way, or that ranting should stop. The author can only make suggestions and give advice. Politely.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 comments

magicalist9y ago

Yeah, that's bullshit.

> For that, I am sorry.

So you get what he's asking (stop the sniping without substance), you're (supposedly) contrite about it, and yet in the same breath you continue to do what you acknowledge is exactly that behavior.

Either there's some fundamental disconnect in your mind that you need to address or you should just say what you mean.

atemerevOP9y ago

I do not attack or blame the author, I say that the work (Babel6) is no good. This doesn't imply anything about the author.

You, on the other hand, attack _me_ personally. You don't even say "your words sound rude" — that I would understand.

Or there is no difference to you?

rfrey9y ago

Your comment reads (to me) as more attacks sandwiched between slices of insincere apologies. You likely did not mean it to read that way, but it does.

atemerevOP9y ago

I just tried to note that I am not surprised by the amount of rage that Babel6 transition had caused, as well as that it has nothing to do with its author's person at all.

Inalienable right of the author: at any moment in time, they can say "this is my vision and my art — take it as is or leave it".

Inalienable right of the user/reader/consumer: judging author's work in whatever way or form they want, misunderstanding it, and generally abusing it in the ways never intended by author.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse