Sure, but for privacy, VPNs are shit. You can't recommend VPNs for privacy.
If this was branded differently, I'm sure it could be a great resource.
>This is more to prevent dragnet bullshit like the UK RIPA which requires ISPs to keep a list of sites visited.
The site doesn't really read like that, it has several suggestions that don't seem to apply to those seeking only for minimal levels of privacy to maybe hide from the local government.
As a quick example:
>Avoid VPNs that use CloudFlare, Incapsula, and other such services.
Doesn't seem like a major concern for someone only worried about UK RIPA.
Why not? Doesn't it depend on your purpose and threat level? If you have state level actors chasing you than VPNs will only be part of your opsec toolchest — preferring TOR where possible and being very strict about where you access the internet (certainly not at home). But if you are just downloading the latest episode of Sherlock from your local hive of wretched scum and villainy, a VPN will surely help.
VPNs are only part of the solution of course (not using any social media, not connecting to any of your normal accounts, limiting VPN use to whatever it is you want to keep private), but you seem adamant that even this is not a valid use of VPNs, or am I misreading your posts?
