The article indicates that potassium permanganate is what caused the water to be pink.
The commenter is explaining that potassium permanganate is harmless and usually used as a water purifier anyway.
I have no idea how that can be interpreted as "Oh that's absolutely demonstrably awful, here's X to subsidize your life,"
I should have been more diligent and usually am.
I was projecting other feelings from previous arguments and this isn't the place for it and I deserve those down votes as it clearly wasn't a super helpful addition to the discussion.
Sorry and thanks.
Harmless at what level? Because even the most harmless chemical substance will become harmful at high enough doses.
1: http://bluecollarprepping.blogspot.com/2014/08/potassium-per...
Next time, you might want to use Di-hydrogen monoxide, it's a much scarier name. Everybody knows monoxide is dangerous on anything.
If you mean that people want non-pink water, I think that's reasonable. But I also think it's reasonable that the reason the pink color is explained by the actual purifying process. I too concede that the water controlling authorities screwed up by using too much of the chemical, but it seems not in a dangerous amount, and they did well to communicate exactly why, and they also conducted tests to ensure safety of the water, thus effectively following up and checking the potential problems with their screw-up.
As far as government mistakes go, I think this one was relatively mild and handled in an adequate manner.