And nonetheless a CRT from the time would show these as different scanlines.
A "CRT from the time" - the things littered around my apartment that occupy a little too much of my time - can easily illustrate the effect I am describing of a progressive scan image without alternating scanline positions. Go grab almost any '90s game console, or have fun with the Sega Genesis, which supports 240p as well as 480i; Sonic 2 uses 480i to fit two viewports into the two-player mode, but uses 240p during a single-player game.
Justifications for this:
0. TV hblank rate is 15,625Hz - at 50 fields/sec, that's 312.5 lines/field, some way short of the 400 you'd need to display 2 fields
1. Out of the 312.5 lines/field, only 288 are booked for the visible area, and most TVs can barely resolve them precisely anyway
2. When the TV is displaying one field in one set of scanlines, and the previous in the other, where does the data for the previous field come from?
2.1. TVs of the period have no buffer
2.2. Computers of the period don't generally have the RAM (or sometimes the hardware) to double buffer
2.3. The image produced is based on more than just the contents of the RAM anyway, increasing the RAM requirements (if you were to try to do this)
2.3. Cheap DRAM of the period doesn't have the bandwidth to scan out two frames'-worth at once)
Here's a pic of my BBC Micro, with interlaced output, running a program that flashes the screen alternating red and white: http://i.imgur.com/1XvkRso.jpg - you can see that at the top it's scanning out an entirely white frame, and at the bottom there's the end of the previous entirely red frame that's in the process of decaying.
As an example of 2.3 - note that the difference between one frame and the next here is entirely the video registers - the RAM stays exactly the same. Only one of the palette registers changes (and the flashing cursor is added by the hardware as a sort of post process step).
(I suspect the red/green/blue blur at the bottom of the white region is an artefact of my phone's terrible camera. Photos from my (slightly) better camera don't have that, but they do look overall the same. However today only my phone is willing to play ball with my PC.)
Fortunately there's a command to switch it off, and no TV seems to mind displaying 50.08Hz output rather than 50Hz...
†There's some interesting exceptions!
Look at other responses in this thread to see how interlacing used to be achieved and the flexibility it had.