undefined | Better HN

0 pointswtetzner8y ago0 comments

> it's literally the worst possible license choice for someone who doesn't care about the license.

Why is that? Because with the GPL you can't as easily capitalize commercially on the work of others at no cost? Or because picking a more permissive permissive license means that other people can keep their improvements to the source you provided proprietary?

The GPL seems like the safest choice if you don't know what to pick.

0 comments

eridius8y ago

It's only "safest" in that it puts a bunch of restrictions that the original developer hopefully cares about. If the original developer doesn't care about licensing, then they don't care about those restrictions and so having them in place is counterproductive.

GPL is the worst choice because it's basically the most restrictive license I can think of, and it's intentionally viral, which makes GPL-licensed software dangerous to work with (the source of) by anyone who hasn't already bought into the GPL ecosystem.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointswtetzner8y ago0 comments

> it's literally the worst possible license choice for someone who doesn't care about the license.

The GPL seems like the safest choice if you don't know what to pick.

0 comments

eridius8y ago

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse