Ask HN: Which programming languages do not have corporate branding?

Mozilla employee paid to work on Rust here. We (that is, Mozilla employees who work on Rust) tend to think of Rust as an open source project we contribute to heavily, rather than a Mozilla project that's open source. This has a number of implications.

Mozilla holds a trademark on the name and logo, and pays some salaries. They also pay for the CI bill. Copyright is held by the individual contributors, not Mozilla.

Governance of Rust itself is comprised of many small teams. https://www.rust-lang.org/en-US/team.html Last time I checked, there's roughly 60 people on those teams, and 15 of them are employed by Mozilla. The "core team" is 6 Mozilla employees out of 9 people.

We have had almost 2100 contributors in an all-time sense, for each six-week release period, we have about 120 people on average. So the vast majority of work is done by non-Mozilla people.

Take from this what you will :)

Actually I'm glad there are (non profit) Python/Perl/Ruby etc foundations. I don't see that as corporate branding, but <language name> branding, e.g. owner of the trademark, receiving donations, running conferences.

Lua is independent http://www.lua.org/authors.html

Nim https://nim-lang.org/ seems to be an independent language that is getting some traction lately. I haven't used it myself but am impressed with how well the project is doing.