This is why have stopped contributing to OSS in a public fashion over 20 years ago. Nasty backstabbing politics (and in my case, there was actually a business purpose behind it, unlike most of this drama) People online are awful and the veil of anonymity and distance brings out the worst in people.
Fuck that.
https://web.archive.org/web/20170821212745/https://github.co...
1. "Rod’s first action was to apologize to a contributor who had been repeatedly moderated"
2. "Rod did not moderate himself when asked by another foundation director"
3. "Rod tweeted in support of an inflammatory anti-Code-of-Conduct article"
NOW ASK YOURSELF: Why was those points removed? Supposedly to save Rod from harassment. But right now EVERYONE speculates what serious bad behavior it must have been that leaving it in the public could lead to harassment! NO ONE would EVER imagine that HE'S #1 BAD BEHAVIOR WAS APOLOGIZING!!!
The second one was not removing his comment THAT DIDN'T INCLUDE ANYTHING RUDE, OFFENSIVE or in ANY WAY unacceptable, while NO EVIDENCE was ever provided that would demonstrate that he was even asked to do so!
The third point is DELIBERATELY MISLEADING. In fact Rod tweeted NO MORE NO LESS: "If you've never considered the potential downsides of codes of conduct, here's a good place to start" and posted a link to The Neurodiversity Case for Free Speech ARTICLE by A KNOWN PSYCHOLOGIST Geoffrey Miller - "an American evolutionary psychologist, serving as an associate professor of psychology at the University of New Mexico and known for his expertise in sexual selection in human evolution" (Wikipedia) THAT WAS DESCRIBED AS: "tweeted in support of an inflammatory anti-Code-of-Conduct article"
NOW ASK YOURSELF: was the actual accusations, the 3 worst things that Rod ever did, removed to save Rod from harassment? Or to make us all speculate of what crimes it must have been that he could be harassed if anyone knew what he did? FOOD FOR THOUGHT.
.
REFERENCES:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15176562
https://medium.com/@rvagg/the-truth-about-rod-vagg-f063f6a53...
https://twitter.com/rvagg/status/887652116524707841
http://quillette.com/2017/07/18/neurodiversity-case-free-spe...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geoffrey_Miller_(psychologist)
.
SEE ALSO:
The Node's Code of Conduct was originally copied from:
https://www.contributor-covenant.org/
which has FEMINIST colors and explicitly link to extreme FEMINIST website: the so called Geek Feminism wiki, that fights to introduce 50% women (of course feminists) to every software project, NOT BASED ON SKILLS which is explicitly stated on the website.
If you read more closely you will not only see obvious links to FEMINISM but also to MARXISM. At this point it should be no surprise that they are fighting with "white men" that they hate using their own made-up language like cisheteronormative bias etc.
ONE OF THE FEMINISTS FROM NODE WERE ACCUSED OF MUCH WORST VIOLATIONS THAN ROD VAGG AND THEY ARE ALREADY MAKING EXCUSES:
>>> Multiple CoC violations by Node.js board member Ashley Williams https://www.reddit.com/r/node/comments/6whs2e/multiple_coc_v...
WARNING: there is RASIST and SEXIST language quoted in the tweets written by Ashley Williams, promoting GENOCIDE and forced CASTRATION but apparently that is nothing compared to an innocent tweet by Rod Vagg.
Now DON'T BE SURPRISED!
FEMINISM is like MARXISM (and in fact there are very strong links between the two).
This is CLASS CONFLICT. Like MARXISTS don't want EQUAL RIGHTS for the CAPITALIST - they just want to TAKE OVER what they achieved. THE SAME IS HERE.
So PEOPLE!!! Don't be surprised if you let those FEMINIST "CODE OF CONDUCTS" into your projects!!!
