Before we know it, things like eating and sex will be "the same as" doing drugs, because people enjoy it. Oh, and the same with your morning coffee.
Let's all eat bread and water, frown, reproduce via test tubes, work for the man, and vote Republican!
* It's something you don't talk about (or do) in polite company or around kids.
* It's something you don't do with someone you're not married to. (And by God you better to married to the opposite sex)
* It's implied that if you are married you must be having sex on at last a weekly schedule.
* I won't got into details but anything beyond the basics is strictly forbidden. (Candles are only allowed for mood lighting.)
:) All tongue in cheek of course.
Being an audio engineer, I've been playing around with binaural beats since the mid-90s. they strike me a useful meditation aid, but then so does low-volume pink noise. 'I-dosing' is about as thrilling and dangerous as yoga, which is to say hardly at all.
Perhaps most importantly, what will happen if the kids move onto harder stuff like Steve Reich, Philip Glass or even Janet Cardiff’s installation, “The Killing Machine“?
This over-reliance on filler material is one of the things I dislike about old media. Since newspapers and broadcast news are anchored in time, recycled and anniversary stories have some utility in that they'll be new to enough of the audience to justify occasional repetition. But on the internet where information is mostly persistent, it's high time to abandon this capsule approach and move towards extending and updating a single story - a bit more along the lines of Wikipedia, but preferably without the opaque editing fiefdoms.
Part of my grumpiness stems from ongoing annoyance at content farming and a degrading signal:noise ratio. The internet feels constipated to me now in a way that seems to happen about every 6 years or so.* So I've got a spiffy new beta interface for Google News - yay; but their deployment of Caffeine means that my news feed contains more and more populist rubbish (like this i-dosers story).
Oh, and get off my lawn :-)
* the good part of that is the opportunities for disruption. Past information logjams were broken up by the arrival of HTML/Mosaic; Google search; and client-side web apps.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dopamine#Motivation_and_pleasur...
However, I have a hard time seeing this as a gateway drug any more than ice cream is a gateway drug. Both produce a dopamine response, but no one worries about kids getting on cocaine after eating an ice cream Sunday.
I can tell you that http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=en1asB1haQM was an interesting experience (in particular the transition that starts at 1:40) sitting down with volume in moderate levels on ordinary earbud-style phones. Lying down in sort-of sensory deprivation, it could be more so.
BTW, I would like to share a heavier drug I used at a local TED conference. Enjoy it while it's legal:
If they're paying for this, I don't think they're getting their money's worth. Just get some nice sennheiser's, pop in some Court of the Crimson King. and lie back.
Secondly, this news report is far more brilliant than the Fox news report on the "SexBox" , so I'm glad today's high schoolers still know how to push the buttons of their parents and the surrounding community.
Oh God no. Children with open minds?! That could lead them to think for themselves!
Some people are particularly sensitive to audio and visual stimulation that can create relaxation, disortientation, and other sensations. This is not news.
(I'm a little ashamed to make this reference, but it seemed apposite)
Still, good for a laugh, I guess. 10 points for every teenager that can freak out their parents with this.
"If you find literature on Fourier Analysis, Electronics or Calculus in your child's bedroom, please get your child to Oklahoma and get them help from the nearest minister."
"Do you feel it? It's reaaaaaally mellow... you gotta really focus"
I tell you what digital drug is. Digital drug is the sensational news media that got the vast people hooked on their news addiction. They surely should be banned.
The psychedelics for example aren't illegal because of any harmful physical effects - they're some of the safest drugs we know of, physically. They're illegal because of the world dissolving experience you might have on one. For a people like us who have built up an elaborately abstract way of viewing our world, this is quite threatening.
I think it can also speak about why something like marijuana is still illegal yet caffeine is a daily sacrament for us - one makes you go even faster and work even more, the other makes you fairly uninterested in such things.
Catchy. I expect to hear more of it.
Kansas’ Mustang Public School district isn’t taking the threat lightly, and sent out a letter to parents warning them of the new craze. The educators have gone so far as to ban iPods at school, in hopes of preventing honor students from becoming cyber-drug fiends, News 9 reports.
And of course this is sensational bullshit reporting at a 6th-grade level, but while we're at it, that's what led to Reefer Madness as well. Take this kind of lunacy as a serious threat, and if you meet someone who seriously believes this shit irl, I humbly suggest you punch them in the face.