By definition 0.09% is not significant. Eliminating it would not significantly impact climate change.
Would you optimize a program by refactoring a function that used 0.09% of the execution time?
“if it's green code,..”
My point is that you don’t start by looking for 0.09% improvements when you’re profiling your code.
As for climate change, we are looking for cleaner energy options. The world’s energy use is going to increase greatly as billions more come out of poverty. China, for example, is going to increase nuclear energy to be almost on par with the US over the next decade:
https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2017/09/china-will-more-than-d...
counterpoint: 0.09 is a lot of money for one person
the rebuttal has zero to do with the point given and even less to do with the overall thread about mining being wasteful.
I don't think our technology is so advanced that producing 18TWh of energy per year can be done without impact on environment.
“Bill Gates has committed his fortune to moving the world beyond fossil fuels and mitigating climate change”
Back to my original comment: “You derailed the entire point of the article by taking a tangent into a completely different...”
If we move beyond fossil fuels and use 100% wind, solar, and nuclear energy, for example, does the electricity use for Bitcoin matter?
Think about it, almost a thousandth of world's electricity consumption completely wasted on BTC alone.