undefined | Better HN

0 pointsvog8y ago0 comments

> Or that you might waste a click on an article that you have read it before

Shouldn't that be the sole decision of the reader?

The year suffix enables everyone to make that decision on their own.

Some don't want to read anything twice. Some especially like good, old truths. And most are somewhere in the between, having differences preferences depending on the topic.

0 comments

ci5er8y ago

Fair enough. And almost certainly right.

Where does the line of full disclosure fall on the submitter, the editor and exploration by the reader?

AND! IF we push it to the submitter, does the quantity of high-quality submission fall because they think it's a pain in the ass (that happened to me in use-net, btw: an 'ah, fuck it' attitude after 15+ years in a news group)

Hmmm. I like your balanced approach to thinking about it. But I don't know that my bitching or your response get us any where close to where we all want to be.

Q1: Where do we want to be on this article/position? Q2: How much time does it take from the committed to battle the spam?

Net-net: Tagging articles as old and moving on is a pretty dang good compromise.

EDIT: Anyway - to parent - I get frustrated by the "TL;DR" posts and I want to post angry scrants about learning how to read. But at the end of the day - I'm old and losing. They're young and winning. And, you know? They feel pretty good about it - so I should too... :-)

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse