I'm not really interested in these details, and "make bigger buttons" was just an example of what an implication might have been (as indicated by "e.g."). What I tried to criticise was the vagueness of the linked page and the scarcity of information.
> What I tried to criticise was the vagueness of the linked page and the scarcity of information.
So if you are not interested in "these details", but you found the page vague and the information scarce, what details should it have included so as not to be vague?
