undefined | Better HN

0 pointsbrongondwana8y ago0 comments

I'm literally RIGHT NOW writing up an email to the IETF EXTRA mailing list, following up from the email I sent as co-chair to the IETF JMAP mailing list about conflicts for our session in London at IETF101 in March.

We've been working inside the IETF on JMAP since Chicago (IETF98) in March last year.

0 comments

Shoothe8y ago

Excellent! Is there a place to look for progress on this front? IETF mailing lists? jmap.io?

brongondwanaOP8y ago

We're keeping jmap.io up-to-date with the latest spec (including the calendar and contacts bits - calendar is partially underway through ietf calext - contacts are not yet on standards track)

Also:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/jmap/about/

Has links to the latest revisions of the drafts - and to the github repo where issues are being tracked.

Shoothe8y ago

Thanks a lot! I really appreciate it.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointsbrongondwana8y ago0 comments

We've been working inside the IETF on JMAP since Chicago (IETF98) in March last year.

0 comments

Shoothe8y ago

Excellent! Is there a place to look for progress on this front? IETF mailing lists? jmap.io?

brongondwanaOP8y ago

We're keeping jmap.io up-to-date with the latest spec (including the calendar and contacts bits - calendar is partially underway through ietf calext - contacts are not yet on standards track)

Also:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/jmap/about/

Has links to the latest revisions of the drafts - and to the github repo where issues are being tracked.

Shoothe8y ago

Thanks a lot! I really appreciate it.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse