Can we get cryptographically signed commit integrity into the mainstream instead?
Edit: Now that I think about it, can see why. I have seen merges where is was good enough to merge, but needed som slight adjustments. Rebase/merge with minor changes would be a good use for this, and would allow for better crediting of both authors.
This is especially useful when using https://teletype.atom.io :)
It doesn't work great for our open source projects though where visibility on GitHub tends to be more important.
I think that `how much code has been changed by developer` is not a good metric for performance. There might be weeks when I'm barely writing any code and getting the most work done.
Issue trackers on the other hand can be good to track performance.