http://energystorage.org/energy-storage/technologies/pumped-...
https://www.economist.com/news/technology-quarterly/21603184...
http://wordpress.ei.columbia.edu/lenfest/files/2012/11/Abstr...
"Storing Renewable Energy Using Thermodynamic" ... what, exactly?
These are all basic physics concepts. These guys are claiming to be able to store the energy as thermal energy, and then get it back out at 70% efficiency without much degradation inside of 25 years.
All these ideas are plausible from a physics point of view, but I don't buy this simply because it requires an efficient way of converting heat to energy. If this existed, it would already be a holy grail for other reasons. Being able to turn the waste-heat from an engine back into more energy efficiently would be incredible. Right now, to get energy from heat, you typically need the heated material to be near something that's very cold, and you use the difference in temperature to get energy out of it. Or you boil water and spin turbines. It sounds like MAYBE that's what these guys are doing, if what they are claiming to be able to do is legitimate.
"thermodynamic" is an adjective that denotes "having to do with thermodynamics".
this is utterly petty, i know, but it really jars.