undefined | Better HN

0 pointslpolovets8y ago0 comments

But isn't a 1st meeting with a GP not a real meeting as well in that case? Because if money is not on the table at meeting #1 (whether with a GP or associate), then it's not a real meeting. And that means the only real meeting is the 3rd meeting (partner meeting)... but you can't get there without the first two "encounters" :).

0 comments

borski8y ago

Associates cannot generally make investment decisions, and do not generally factor heavily into the decision to invest. A GP does; thus, impressing the GP on the 1st meeting makes it a real meeting. Impressing an associate on the 1st meeting is effectively useless, except for getting you to the real '1st meeting.'

That's how most founders see it, and why the advice of most former founders is 'avoid associates unless there is absolutely no way you can get in front of a GP directly.'

That's not meant to sound offensive, but it's definitely how most founders I've spoken to see it.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 comments

borski8y ago

That's how most founders see it, and why the advice of most former founders is 'avoid associates unless there is absolutely no way you can get in front of a GP directly.'

That's not meant to sound offensive, but it's definitely how most founders I've spoken to see it.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse