undefined | Better HN

0 pointsindigodaddy7y ago0 comments

Could a viable Facebook competitor be built on a distributed/p2p type network, perhaps something like ipfs and/or mesh networking?

0 comments

toomuchtodo7y ago

Have you heard of Mastodon?

https://joinmastodon.org/

newscracker7y ago

Isn't Mastodon more of a Twitter replacement than a replacement for Facebook (which has time line, groups, pages, etc.)? I'm curious to know what's closer to what Facebook provides and is decentralized.

BadassFractal7y ago

Diaspora?

1 more reply

fabianhjr7y ago

Yes, scuttlebutt even works great over mesh networks and intermittent internet.

http://scuttlebutt.nz/

https://ssbc.github.io/scuttlebutt-protocol-guide/

im_dario7y ago

Although Scuttlebutt is a nice solution, I think it fails to replace Facebook because:

1. Different use case: trying it out it reminded me more of a Slack/IRC/bulletin board than anything else.

2. Different framing: it uses a public square (Twitter) framing (follow, follower, channel) instead of a personal relationships framing (friends, groups, etc).

3. Too complex for casual users: this is kind of ironic because Scuttlebutt is modeled after real life interactions but in a way it ends being too complex with pubs (public and private), long and cryptic user IDs, etc.

These are some reasons but there are more. Happy to discuss them.

netchkin7y ago

I have been intrigued by scuttlebutt for a few months now, and these are pretty interesting comments you make. Did you try to discuss them with the community around scuttlebutt?

1 more reply

marknadal7y ago

Yupe, and you can start building your own in as short as 4min and 40 lines of code - https://scrimba.com/c/c2gBgt4 (interactive coding tutorial, meant to go along with this article - https://hackernoon.com/so-you-want-to-build-a-p2p-twitter-wi... )!

jrs957y ago

It seems unrealistic because people would have to make the effort to publish their content on that network to keep it available. Or pay someone else to do so. A distributed approach to this is definitely interesting, but it's more technically challenging and it's not a silver bullet.

The big problem is how to fund a social network that doesn't rely on selling it's users data, IMO.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 comments

toomuchtodo7y ago

Have you heard of Mastodon?

https://joinmastodon.org/

newscracker7y ago

BadassFractal7y ago

Diaspora?

1 more reply

fabianhjr7y ago

Yes, scuttlebutt even works great over mesh networks and intermittent internet.

http://scuttlebutt.nz/

https://ssbc.github.io/scuttlebutt-protocol-guide/

im_dario7y ago

Although Scuttlebutt is a nice solution, I think it fails to replace Facebook because:

1. Different use case: trying it out it reminded me more of a Slack/IRC/bulletin board than anything else.

2. Different framing: it uses a public square (Twitter) framing (follow, follower, channel) instead of a personal relationships framing (friends, groups, etc).

These are some reasons but there are more. Happy to discuss them.

netchkin7y ago

I have been intrigued by scuttlebutt for a few months now, and these are pretty interesting comments you make. Did you try to discuss them with the community around scuttlebutt?

1 more reply

marknadal7y ago

jrs957y ago

The big problem is how to fund a social network that doesn't rely on selling it's users data, IMO.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse