In boys: the lower the digit ratio, the more robust the face (opens in new tab)

(rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org)

8 pointsanarchimedes7y ago2 comments

2 comments

In 17 Caucasian boys

This is yet another irrelevant phrenology paper relying on probable p-hacking to validate an obvious, useless hypothesis. What compels HN users to post this dross?

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

In boys: the lower the digit ratio, the more robust the face (opens in new tab)

(rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org)

8 pointsanarchimedes7y ago2 comments

2 comments

chuckledog7y ago

In 17 Caucasian boys

inteleng7y ago

This is yet another irrelevant phrenology paper relying on probable p-hacking to validate an obvious, useless hypothesis. What compels HN users to post this dross?

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse