undefined | Better HN

0 pointsnemothekid7y ago0 comments

I don't think you actually answered his point. Sure you could build an IM client that is GDPR compliant, but at what point do the costs become so high that everyone just defaults to using Facebook because (1) they can afford to be compliant and (2) they are trained well enough to not fuck up their encryption.

In other words, are we moving towards a world where unless you are VC backed (Signal, Telegram, Whatsapp, etc) don't bother building an IM client? Also note, I don't think there might be anything wrong with that - if we expect all our communications to be E2E encrypted, maybe Joe Shmoe shouldn't be writing an IM client.

0 comments

badsectoracula7y ago

There is an assumption that there is some additional "natural" cost involved because of GDPR, but where does that assumption come from? The cost might currently exist if you are not compliant and you need to convert (or you need to skirt the edge between what is allowed and what not), but if you start with being firmly compliant from the design phase, where does the cost come from?

tobltobs7y ago

Eg. the DPO.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointsnemothekid7y ago0 comments

0 comments

badsectoracula7y ago

tobltobs7y ago

Eg. the DPO.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse