undefined | Better HN

0 pointsfwdpropaganda7y ago0 comments

> You need a lot of optimism about solutions for global warming and pollution.

I disagree. Unless you can show me a first-principle calculation for why a specific number should be "too much", then I don't think it's reasonable to assume that we're either above or below such a number. Don't get me wrong: I agree that such a number must exist. But you seem certain that we're above it, which isn't based on anything as far as I can tell.

0 comments

AnimalMuppet7y ago

It seems clear that, with the same level of technology, more people put more load on the environment than fewer people do. The question then becomes, are we currently putting "too much" load on the environment? I think that's where the dispute lies.

And since there is no clear definition of "too much", there is no provably correct answer to the question. One person looks around, sees what's happening to the oceans, the carbon dioxide level, and so on, and says "Of course it's too much!". Another looks around, sees things "pretty much the same as before", and says "clearly not too much".

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointsfwdpropaganda7y ago0 comments

> You need a lot of optimism about solutions for global warming and pollution.

0 comments

AnimalMuppet7y ago

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse