http://warbird-photos.com/special/temp/CVN72-D5_Combat_Direc...
https://www.extremetech.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Zumwa...
https://static01.nyt.com/images/2016/03/31/blogs/20160331WIP...
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d1/US_Navy_...
Quotes from a military study regarding lighting:
> Dissatisfaction with the red lighting system caused the crews of many ships to alter the lighting within their work environment. Some would extinguish all lighting, and some tried a white light configuration in which the overhead lights in the vicinity of the visual display equipment were turned off, while lights away from the visual display equipment remained on. There were many complaints of eye strain, fatigue, and headaches. In addition, watch-standers reported that working under red ambient illumination was also fatiguing, made focusing difficult, and significantly impaired their ability to identify color-coded information from charts.
Pilots, drivers and people walking around do.
I'm not saying that you should have blue lighting in your bedroom, we know it's bad. The author did little research before writing this, and invoked authority (the military) without being aware that you can invoke the same authority to promote blue lighting.
(Probably would be useful on a plane or helicopter, too, but would be balanced out by other concerns.)
You do - because you may need to leave that box in a hurry to either evacuate the ship or to fight. Why else do you think the military do it?
I live in Salt Lake City and there has been an unfortunate push by Rocky Mountain Power to replace all the streetlights with bright blue/white LED overhead lights. Their output is significantly greater than the lights they are replacing and the light is completely obtrusive. In the city there is the unfortunate and unavoidable issue of spillage into peoples bedrooms.
I've also had the unpleasant task of coaxing my dog to give up the dead birds that have suddenly started showing up my back yard. Likely attributable to the new "better" lights.
While we'll never be going back to the orange glow of high-pressure sodium street lights, perhaps a compromise can be found. How about specifying 'halogen-match' (~2700K) colour temperature LEDs for street lights? White enough to create a secure environment, but warm enough not to quite resemble daylight and all the sleep-disturbing, wildlife-disrupting problems that come with that.
Another issue is the way that LED street lights are designed causes a huge amount of glare. Often as a pedestrian or driver, your line of site is directly into the LED matrix itself. With old-style street lights, reflectors or diffusers were typically used to reduce glare, but those have been done away with.
Edit: Back in the late 70's and early 80's, monochrome monitors were prevalent and one had to choose the screen color when choosing terminal/monitor. Apple 2's and most IBM PC's monitor were green, while Radio Shack TRS80 were bluish/white if I recall. At university, we had Wyse terminals with yellowish/amber color.
I also remember working on a terminal attached to a mainframe running IBM RPG III, and it was distinctly dark red, which was probably the coolest color I'd ever seen, and which I'd never seen anywhere else. That reddish color made me feel like I was in a sci-fi movie.
The human eye has "better resolution" for green light (vs red and blue). It's also why the Bayer pattern array has twice the ammount of green elements vs red (or blue).
Since black is the same black in both cases, a green CRT will therefore has a higher perceived contrast.
The terminal you're thinking of may have been an IBM 3290:
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/f3/ef/53/f3ef53c11973a83b2109...
(I recall having a 1600×1200 mono display at work circa 1990 when a high-end PC was pushing 800×600 SVGA. Beautiful and crisp, but porn^H^H^H^H the internet killed monochrome monitors.)
If I recall correctly, significant effects required rather bright lights. The light level outdoors is like 100000 times brighter. A laptop probably won't make much of a difference then.
I run f.lux or redshift, but I'm suspecting that it really doesn't do anything rather than reminding me by going totally red and inconvenient that it's about time to stop trying to read or watch every interesting thing on the Internet.
For me, it's the endless source of interesting things that keeps me awake, I guess because I've stressed out and turned into a total information junkie. My mind craves information. Unfortunately it thinks that recordings of air traffic controllers etc is more valuable than sleep.
One day the weather app will get the outside colour temperature locally and match the OS to it. :)
Also, just an anecdote. But if flux is on I will get tired around 10pm. If it's off I won't get tired until well after midnight.
Bright LEDs have no place anywhere where lights are dim, especially on electronics. Someone found this problem irritating enough that they started selling stickers specifically for the use of covering the damn things. https://www.amazon.com/LightDims-Black-Out-Electronics-Appli...
Be sure to fiddle with the config [0] to customize the color temperature of the application even further to your liking -- the default settings can sometimes mess with your display's viewing angels.
[0] https://github.com/jonls/redshift/blob/master/redshift.conf....
I like my LightPack LED lights behind the monitor painting the room in a dull red at night.
Sometime ago somebody on reddit or here on HN claimed in a comment that f.lux does not actually reduce the amount of blue light if you measure it. Unfortunately I never saw any replies or sources, and looking for discussions about that subject were unsuccessful.
Does anybody have any actual knowledge that could support or refute that claim?
PS: I hate it when people make claims like that and don't even attempt to support it. Now I'm still looking for an answer months later.
Can't find source now.
And we may be on the cusp of the next brilliant revolution in lighting displays with solid-state Graphene. The graphene / graphene-oxide boundary represents a near infinite bandgap differential. And with a controlled applied voltage, can be tuned to any color in the visible spectrum and beyond.
Combined with extensive end user testing in the Human Psychology Lab this could very well lead to a breakthrough.
In my own experience the most glaring is the 5am wake up time. When pupils are dilated. And you are checking any overnight messages from Asia or Europe. Occasionally Nite Mode will simply fail to register and you get a good blast of photons directly on a still sleepy and sensitive retinal plane. Long term repeated exposures can't be a good thing.
For example: If I need to leave my computer running overnight running a job, I have to tape over or block the power button in order to get a decent night's sleep as it has a nasty habit of utterly illuminating the room - the hard disk activity light is much more tolerable.
One time I stopped in at a strip club in Connecticut. I only stayed for about a minute because all the lighting was blue. It was really unpleasant in general, and, worse, I couldn't really see anything I would want to see. And if I could see anything, I'm not really into the White Walker look.
Back when CFL bulbs were becoming a thing, I discovered with joy how much less irritated my eyes were (and how much more relaxed my mind was) when I used CFLs with high color temps - "daylight" temps around 6300K compared to the piss yellow color of typical incandescent bulbs. At first the "blue" light was shocking, but after a moment of adjustment it became so pleasing and illuminating.
So I fully embraced that for years, gleefully moving to LEDs with similar color temps. My last office had my custom made shelf all the way around the room that had upward firing LED strips. It was awesome!
But then, after an unfortunate several months of insane crunch-time work, I started having eye problems... many different weird things happening with my eyes, from focus issues to strange pressure feelings.
I did an about face and shifted my monitors to more red, at much lower brightness, and with dark mode UIs where possible. Then I turned off the super awesome daylight LED strips and just used one yellower little LED lamp behind my monitor to provide a bit of desk surface light. Almost instantly my eye issues went away. I was still working far too many hours each day, staring at my screens. The only change was brightness and color of all my light sources.
My ability to sleep didn't seem to change, but my mind was always too busy to fall asleep anyway. So I can't claim that changing colors improved my sleep. It did, however, seem to stop harming my eyes.
And I think this is a problem, since you can't now for sure that wether the cause is blue light or the lifestyle people who are exposed to a lot of blue light have (staying up late, long office jobs, who knows?).
To be clear, I do not refute the harm of blue light, I just want to suggest being cautious with the broader health effect claims.
Blue started as a difficult color to make (and it still wears OLED screens much faster) and became a symbol of modernity. It also creates an interesting halo effect in most lenses (even our eyes) because we can't focus it well.
Hmmm.
She does make a good, er, case, for change though, and I like her work.