undefined | Better HN

0 pointsGFischer7y ago0 comments

It does violate the letter of the law. B1 visa is only for training, meetings, conferences, etc, if you work remotely for an U.S. company you're not supposed to work while there, only training and meetings. Not sure if you work for a foreign entity (maybe Facebook Ireland is a separate, foreign entity for B1 visa purposes, and maybe they're being paid by an Ukranian entity in Ukrania). B2 is the tourism visa, so definitely no work, but most people get a dual B1/B2 visa.

Edit: apparently the key part is "no salary/income from a U.S. based source". So maybe they're in the right.

In practice, if they're only staying for a few months I don't know if USCIS will care, unless they get caught red-handed.

I wouldn't want to argue with USCIS about the letter of the law though, they'll deport first, ask questions later.

https://travel.state.gov/content/dam/visas/BusinessVisa%20Pu...

0 comments

xyzzyz7y ago

Ah, I meant to write that they routinely travel on _B1_ visa for work purposes -- I confused which one is tourist, and which one is business visa. And yes, the difference here is mostly immaterial, since most people simply get a dual B1/B2 visa.

> I wouldn't want to argue with USCIS about the letter of the law though, they'll deport first, ask questions later.

I don't think that's how it works in practice. It is quite rare that people are deported in cases like this, and much less on a short notice too.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse