I wouldn't want to live my life knowing that I'm trying to pull everyone and everything over the table and that i make others miserable wherever I go.
If you want to find a business reason: long term relationships and trust both are valuable and build future business and new connections. But, really, the first reason should be enough.
Going in weapons hot is really dangerous for everyone involved and much like lawyers with law, the smartest people will seek to minimize their exposure to risk (ie. courtrooms, raids, etc.)
A better and cheaper solution in a hostage negotiation is to figure out the core motives for the hostage takers (often money [and why they need it]) and lead them to realistic expectations and a feeling of fairness.
It’s not that you shouldn’t exploit them (though in most cases it’s grately beneficial to both parties if you don’t), it’s that if you’re doing it right, you don’t need to in most cases.
There’s always exceptions, but the concept of approaching any deal with a core principle of exploiting the other party is a flawed strategy.
Maybe a society full of sociopaths can get along just fine, but I'd rather not run that experiment.
Please review https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and follow the rules when posting here.
If a business uses your skills to make a profit are you being exploited?
Does it make a difference if you get free lunch, massages, $300k salary, RSUs? Are you still being exploited? Where’s the line...
Profit is the risk premium.
I like to think that we're working towards a bigger goal than simply surviving.