> It claimed the exact opposite of the things said in the article
I'm not sure why you've created two comment trees saying the same thing, I responded to your other comment above.
> Your original comment was not in good faith.
My original comment was my opinion based on my experience and after having read the article. If you disagree, fine, but I don't think it is fair to question my motives. Simple disagreement doesn't mean the person you're disagreeing with is responding in bad faith; asking loaded "questions" which read as thinly veiled insulted however...