undefined | Better HN

0 pointsoarabbus_7y ago0 comments

I think you'll find a hard time finding any source which will claim cigarette smoking under some threshold is not bad for you.

But keep in mind cigarette studies use the metric "pack-years" where 1 pack-year means smoking 20 cigarettes a day, for a year. "Heavy" smokers are generally considered as 2+ pack-year smokers. And it's not like _every_ heavy smoker gets lung cancer. In fact "only" 25% of heavy smokers get lung cancer, 5% of "former smokers", and 0.5% of non-smokers get lung cancer. And 40 cigarettes a day is a LOT!

So you can do an extrapolation with the numbers above to estimate a conclusion. I'd be hard-pressed to believe that 1 cigarette per WEEK is even as harmful as living in a big city like NYC or SF.

0 comments

Pharmakon7y ago

How many of the ones who don’t get lung cancer also don’t suffer from elevetates rates of bronchial infection, cardiovascular symptoms, COPD or emphysema? How many avoid cancers related to smoking other than lung cancer?

oarabbus_OP7y ago

I'd wager that drinking soda daily is more harmful to your health than one single cigarette per week.

Pharmakon7y ago

The equivalent amount of soda per day that would equate to one cigarette per week? I’d take that bet.

oarabbus_OP7y ago

No, one can of soda daily, vs one cigarette smoked per week.

otabdeveloper27y ago

Lung cancer is the least of your problems if you're a smoker.

Smoking greatly increases risks of literally every possible health condition.

(This is why the first question you'll be asked by a doctor is if you smoke or not, no matter what your complaint is.)

oarabbus_OP7y ago

>Smoking greatly increases risks of literally every possible health condition.

Actually, cigarette smoking can reduce the incidence of diabetes, metabolic syndrome, endometrial cancer, and Parkinson's, to name a few.

No, I'm not claiming cigarette smoking is good for you. I acknowledge it's very bad for you.

But if you point me towards two people, one who smokes "one cigarette a week" and does light exercise, and a second individual who is sedentary, and drinks alcohol and soda regularly, I'd wager most of my net worth that the 1-cigarette-per-week individual is far healthier. It's possible for something to be very bad for you AND also for the dangers to be overblown.

yesenadam7y ago

>Smoking greatly increases risks of literally every possible health condition.

Is that actually true? Somehow I doubt it, but I'm open to reading research (or whatever) on the question. (I'm taking you literally because you specifically wrote "literally", but maybe you didn't mean it...literally)

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 comments

Pharmakon7y ago

oarabbus_OP7y ago

I'd wager that drinking soda daily is more harmful to your health than one single cigarette per week.

Pharmakon7y ago

The equivalent amount of soda per day that would equate to one cigarette per week? I’d take that bet.

oarabbus_OP7y ago

No, one can of soda daily, vs one cigarette smoked per week.

otabdeveloper27y ago

Lung cancer is the least of your problems if you're a smoker.

Smoking greatly increases risks of literally every possible health condition.

(This is why the first question you'll be asked by a doctor is if you smoke or not, no matter what your complaint is.)

oarabbus_OP7y ago

>Smoking greatly increases risks of literally every possible health condition.

Actually, cigarette smoking can reduce the incidence of diabetes, metabolic syndrome, endometrial cancer, and Parkinson's, to name a few.

No, I'm not claiming cigarette smoking is good for you. I acknowledge it's very bad for you.

yesenadam7y ago

>Smoking greatly increases risks of literally every possible health condition.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse