I agree, I don't find politics-and-science to be good bunk-buddies. They selected 10 out of a huge list, all good articles but are they a true representation of the progress in climate science or are they the top-10 list for Climategate potentials from biased over-estimated distortions of evidence.

All the climategate research, at least what I could tell, pointed to global warming. Just not as much as the authors wanted though.

You tried to discredit the argument on the basis of irrelevant issues with the author, that is an Ad Hominem.