undefined | Better HN

0 pointssenderista7y ago0 comments

That doesn’t sound like “at-most-once”. What if your consumer crashed after processing the message but before committing the offset?

0 comments

aarbor9897y ago

This is a fair thing to point out. For us the “at-most-once” guarantee was based on committing. Luckily our processing was idempotent so in the rare case of the above scenario it wouldn’t cause any duplication

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointssenderista7y ago0 comments

That doesn’t sound like “at-most-once”. What if your consumer crashed after processing the message but before committing the offset?

0 comments

aarbor9897y ago

This is a fair thing to point out. For us the “at-most-once” guarantee was based on committing. Luckily our processing was idempotent so in the rare case of the above scenario it wouldn’t cause any duplication

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse