This "colour" means colour charge, it doesn't have any relation to the regular meaning of "colour of light".
Color charge is essentially as charge. I.e. instead of having +/- you have A/B/C. Except you also have Anti A/B/C.
They can also be in fours. Possibly other configurations; the four and five quark configurations were theorized in 1964 but only confirmed in 2014 & 2015.
> Any reason that could be stated in layman's terms?
None at all, in fact, the source article does so: “In the conventional quark model, composite particles can be either mesons formed of quark–antiquark pairs or baryons formed of three quarks. Particles not classified within this scheme are known as exotic hadrons. When Murray Gell-Mann proposed the quark model in his fundamental 1964 paper, he mentioned the possibility of exotic hadrons such as pentaquarks, but it took 50 years to demonstrate their existence experimentally.”
(There is slightly more detail on the read more link, too.)
> None at all, in fact, the source article does so ….
Did you really mean "None at all"? The rest of your post seems to say the opposite.
Any whole number of terms greater than 1 will allow this, by the way.
Shouldn't there be +2/3 and -2/3 charges as well? Otherwise the only way to do this is with an equal number of +1/3 and -1/3 charges (so not 5 total, for example).
It's just a quick rule for showing how many quarks can fit together, not what kinds of quarks they are.
https://profmattstrassler.com/articles-and-posts/largehadron...