Its 2019 series about failures by school and police in the Parkland school shooting is also excellent. It also features among its public records work an milestone fuckup by officials in terms of PDF non-redaction [2].
[0] https://www.pulitzer.org/prize-winners-by-category/204
[1] https://www.pulitzer.org/winners/sun-sentinel
[2] https://www.cjr.org/local_news/redaction-sun-sentinel.php
This is great
No, the work was eligible. I doubt Dershowitz's petition had any sway over the board. Frankly, while Julie Brown's reporting was astounding, there were better work. The Herald was a finalist for a story they did about gold.
To be clear, I'm not saying he is accurate. I just don't know enough either way. He's obviously an interested party to the whole story.
[1] https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/14003/pulitzer-prize-fake...
> Staffs of The New York Times and The Washington Post
> For deeply sourced, relentlessly reported coverage in the public interest that dramatically furthered the nation’s understanding of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election and its connections to the Trump campaign, the President-elect’s transition team and his eventual administration.
It's clear that they have no intention of abandoning their Russiagate narrative, despite Mueller's report.
Also, multiple people close to Trump have been convicted of various crimes as a result of the past two years of investigation. Even if once the dust settles Trump stands clean and pure as the driven snow, investigators already have plenty to show for their work.
How delusional are you?
And The NYTimes even published an "apology".
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/25/opinion/mueller-trump-no-...
It's disappointing how politicized social media has become.
Mueller never said there was no collusion. Trump said Mueller said there was no collusion. Barr's summary quotes Mueller's report as saying “[T]he investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.” So they didn't find proof of collusion. That is not the same as concluding that collusion did not occur.
Barr also provides this other quote from Mueller's report: “while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”
Latest piece is from june 2018(or I missed soemthing fresher?)!
was hoping to get some awarness about a new cause/topic but this just whats in news cycle everyday.
Pulitzer is rewarding high-brow emotional appeal journalism. All disaster and irrelevant scandal. The journalism we need today is shining light on the ever-increasing complexities of the world and the effects, not the latest shock, awe, and smear.
