undefined | Better HN

0 pointsz3phyr6y ago0 comments

That is during the Shogunate. Before the unification, The samurai were involved with actual on field battles.

0 comments

Mostly using arrows not swords. But yumi is inferior weapon compared to reflexive bow used by Chinese, Korean, Mongol or Turkic soldiers.

Also if you look at any Japanese castle (Himeji had been well preserved by US Bomber Command for navigational purposes) you will quickly realize that any continental army will take at most a week to dry it's moats and dig mines under it's wall. Fortunately Japan never had seen invading army on its soil.

[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yumi

[2] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Composite_bow

This samurai / bushido hype is so much out of proportion and simply untrue.

While in the same time real history of Asia is full of military class of exceptional value. Indian Rajput, Islamic Gunpowder Empires, Malays, Mongols - to name just a few

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gunpowder_Empires

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rajput

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malacca_Sultanate

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qing_dynasty

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hwarang

z3phyrOP6y ago

I am not going to compare medieval continental technology to medieval Japan because that would be against the spirit of comparison. Japan was pretty closed society even when they traded with the continent. While it is true that the continent saw cutting edge tech in terms of unbalanced battle situations, we can surely appreciate the Japanese stuff for it's aesthetic vibe.

If Japan was suddenly in the continent, I am sure they would have to compete and modify their war society like the rest did. But the root aesthetics would be the same.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse