Bad analogy, it would be somewhat valid if I compared the TOTAL number of deaths between activities done by vastly different amount of people.
But I compared PER MWh PRODUCED, so it's nothing like with vending machines vs sharks.
> if 100% of our power came from nuclear, then so would 100% of the deaths per MWh.
If 100% of our MWh came from nuclear, and nuclear has less deaths per MWh - then some deaths would be avoided that now aren't.
How is that not important?
Honestly, your analogy was so bad it seems like intentional manipulation.
