Which is my point - the report's conclusion contradicts a very large number of headlines and stories that the news media spoke of in near-factual terms. We are now in a place where nothing he did impacted the outcome - since the investigation concluded unimpeded, but the fact that he tried is now a new reason to go after him.
This is what I am referring to in my original comment about the quality of journalism and its motivations - it's an endless chase, and to be honest he's right to call it a witch hunt against him specifically.
The investigation was completed though, so nothing was obstructed. The media went from:
he colluded
he didn't collude but he obstructed
he didn't obstruct but he wanted to
That's the point being made here - the media is not doing its due diligence and is generally engaging in predicting the future or misrepresenting facts.
