Yes, and what that means is that today's broad interpretation of the First Amendment (in the USA) is actually very
recent in origin --
Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969) to be exact. Far from being "originalist", it reads intent into the Founders that wasn't there, as some of those same Founders would go on to pass the Alien and Sedition Acts, which wouldn't pass muster today.
It may be time to consider whether the experiment of being permissive when it comes to hate speech has been a failure that has caused more harm than good to society and its citizens.
