From you original comment:
>The fourth amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees that the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and the ninth amendment to the Constitution guarantees that the people retain un-enumerated rights. I, as a citizen of the United States, maintain that one of those unenumerated rights is my right to employ technological defenses against government overreach.
I read two ways to interpret that:
- "Government overreach" is to include even searches authorized by a warrant in which case you are defending unrestricted use of encryption.
- "Government overreach" is to only include warrantless searches in which cause you are only defending using encryption in a manner in which a warrant can break the encryption.
Considering the second option is basically the government's position and the rest of your post seemed anti-government, I thought you were advocating for the first interpretation.
