I guess the US is afraid that terrorists may develop weapons using Adobe flash player xD
This is a glib take on US sanctions regardless of whether you feel US sanctions are appropriate. Sanctions are just a weapon, they're not supposed to specifically ban things that are useful to terrorists. It doesn't matter if terrorists use Adobe flash player or not. What matters is that the bans make life worse for Syrian people and their government. Clearly, it's working, because even savvy Syrian developers have to scramble to find illegal/unofficial 3rd party mirrors and VPNs to access basic downloads which, even if it "does the job", can be severely outdated. Enough of a problem that you're coming to this forum and complaining about it.
> GitHub.com may not be used for purposes prohibited under applicable export control laws, including purposes related to the development, production, or use of nuclear, biological, or chemical weapons or long range missiles or unmanned aerial vehicles.
Not only is this sentence an affront to the English language, but I hope you aren't trying to develop any drone software on GitHub...
Don't forget the old iTunes TOS.
I've been sounding the alarm bells about ITAR, DFARS, EAR compliance for a while now! None of the software vendors I've talked to seem to understand that it is AGAINST THE LAW to upload customer supplied IP to their super-secure Cloud based product that they're trying to get me to switch too. "The lowest TCO, you'll get ROI in 6 months!"
Ya, but are you compliant with NIST 800-171 requirements?
"Ohhh, uhhh... I don't know. I'll ask the engineering team but I'm sure we're fine!"
Ya, ok.
I suspect people will now complain that github does this but <x new service> does not :)
And it happens we're a lot to play poker here.
You seem not to see the true damages he and his team did to, for a start, transatlantic alliances.
And that this is not headed the right way for the next decade either.
I feel for all my peers who I spent my undergrad with in Iran.
These archaic laws need to be deleted. America needs to be shamed for making it so hard for people to gain skills in these countries. Companies need to be shamed for not challenging these laws.
Why is this even a point? Would you be happy if I took away your kids future by pointing out however many fucked up things your country has done?
?!?@!
If you travel to a Forbidden Zone, find they block wireguard, and don't have time to set up obfsproxy, that's a much more straightforwardly manageable outcome than being arbitrarily messed with after your return.
So anybody developing any kind of drone and hosting on github is breaking the law?
The sanctioned countries and regions fall even further behind and open source developers have to deal with the fallout of America's broken foreign policy.
AFAIK its probably not illegal to run your own Git/SVN server...
> On which countries and territories are U.S. government sanctions applied?
> Crimea, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, and Syria.
Crimea? Isn't that part of Russia now, so what is the point of sanctions against Crimea? To affect Crimean policy wouldn't they need to sanction Russia, not Crimea?
So you can take a ship with X to Russia proper, but not to Crimea. Or you can work with a Russian bank, but not a Russian bank based in Crimea.
It's like how Hong Kong is considered a separate territory, despite being a part of China.