Your statement is wrong because there is no reason to believe or any evidence to support the following statement:
> The point of this statement is to signal to the public, that the elite are ready to give them what they want and understand that the inequality is unsustainable. They are prepared to make concessions now and it's up to the public to take them.
Corporations suddenly wanting to tackle inequality and make 'concessions to the public'? That's not a reason for this PR move, that's corporate fairytale.
> I gave a reason for the PR move. I'm curious why you think my reason is wrong?
You did not give any reason other than exactly what the architect of this PR move would expect a very gullible person to interpret this as.