undefined | Better HN

0 pointsbbanyc6y ago0 comments

Minsky was a child molester. There's no way to defend that.

0 comments

Sure there is. How about: "the deposition never actually accuses Minsky of having sex with anyone in the first place"? Or how about, "Greg Benford says (https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/339725/) he was personally present at the incident and witnessed there was no sex"? Wow, who knew it was so easy to defend 'a child molester' for whom there's 'no way to defend' them.

bbanycOP6y ago

1. The deposition that's been made public doesn't allege sex with anyone as it was in a lawsuit against Maxwell for trafficking activities. That's outside its scope.

2. I don't find Benford credible.

3. Minsky kept taking Epstein's money and holding conferences on Epstein's island for over a full decade after the events Giuffre and Benford describe took place. Is there any benign explanation for that?

offtheisland6y ago

The benign explanation is that he didn't know Epstein was a monster (few outside the DA's office did until 2018) and that he accepted funding for AI research.

mikeyouse6y ago

Literally any Google search of the man's name would show that he's a fucking monster. It was never a secret, much less after he was convicted of trafficking an underage prostitute in 2008. Nobody can plead ignorance of his crimes. Everyone who took money from him, traveled with him (and his young 'friends'), is absolutely guilty by association of his continued crimes.

https://www.google.com/search?q=jeffrey+epstein&biw=1345&bih...

aidenn06y ago

I thought Minsky committed statutory rape, not child molestation, or am I behind on things that happened?

1 more reply

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse