undefined | Better HN

0 pointskrastanov6y ago0 comments

Please do not flame the discussion with strawmans. This is a very uncharitable interpretation of what OP wrote. It is not about hatred, it is about minor subconscious preferences that if they exist, the can cause noticeable effects in aggregate.

0 comments

andonisus6y ago

What I wrote is not a strawman, it is the definition of misogyny. Perhaps you are conflating this with sexism. The article used the word misogyny, so that is what I am using.

daveFNbuck6y ago

The article said there was no misogyny. My comment also said that. No one is arguing that people were being driven by misogyny.

andonisus6y ago

The article starts by mentioning "less to do with misogyny".

My comment is about sexism, specifically misogyny (as used by the article).

You reply to my comment taking about how it can be plausible that it is misogyny.

I believe we are talking about misogyny.

1 more reply

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 comments

andonisus6y ago

What I wrote is not a strawman, it is the definition of misogyny. Perhaps you are conflating this with sexism. The article used the word misogyny, so that is what I am using.

daveFNbuck6y ago

The article said there was no misogyny. My comment also said that. No one is arguing that people were being driven by misogyny.

andonisus6y ago

The article starts by mentioning "less to do with misogyny".

My comment is about sexism, specifically misogyny (as used by the article).

You reply to my comment taking about how it can be plausible that it is misogyny.

I believe we are talking about misogyny.

1 more reply

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse